The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my perspective has shifted as any scientist that's following data should you know I mean some people argue oh you change you know how can I yeah yeah you know follow you you're you know change your mind it's like well like when new data comes out like you have to reassess things like I recess the supplements I'm taking I mean the supplements I take Now versus five years ago you know totally different
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.