The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there are some you know significant head uh impacts in particular where you can get shearing of of axons um you know direct axonal injury of of the neurons and then you that you know that cell is essentially is essentially lost as you sort of ripped it apart um but even more um you know milder impacts may cause uh disturbances that include like the the a neuron firing when it shouldn't
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.