The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we accept that on a physical like outward scale why the hell are we not putting that internally like thinking like oh yeah the foods you eat also like that like you need to adapt to that like thousands of generations yeah to adapt to your environment that way yeah with consistent selective pressures
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our genetics changed in a very obvious way when we left to our to hold into our environment so our skin color changes right your skin color change all over the place what changed on the inside right what changed in response to food and obviously skin is just one thing but i mean when it comes to costa rica get a little bit more tan but it's not like i look like a native costa rican somebody who's like been like in central america and their genetics have evolved here for tens of thousands of years