We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
does that mean that it's okay to smoke or do we think that's the best thing for longevity we certainly do not right so when we're when we're making broad recommendations we're doing that based on the consensus of the evidence but we uh we also need to understand that there will be outliers that fall outside that and that's where you know individualization comes in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.