We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the idea that you replacing it in a pill may end up being kind of naive I think that exercised us so many things simultaneously it's like 17 different inputs into the system and it may be the case that it's only if those 17 inputs are provided with the right dynamics and the write-off rates that you get properly functioning more mitochondria
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.