Peter Attia· MD
but I now looks as though they were throwing out the proverbial baby with the bath water now there are good antibodies that are sensitive enough to detect Iris at actual levels
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I now looks as though they were throwing out the proverbial baby with the bath water now there are good antibodies that are sensitive enough to detect Iris at actual levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
people who were skeptical of the original results they actually worked out a mass spec based essay for Iris gold standard and proved that the original antibodies were not specific enough to be useful to actually measure irisin levels