The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one thing is really curious as SARS doesn't affect the upper airway to appreciable even though it uses a single scepter there's also one of the common cold corona viruses in o63 uses a stew only protects the upper airway and doesn't affect the longest any appreciable excellent and that could also account for the change in transmissibility because if you are only infecting the lower airway you're probably less transmissible than SARS Co v2 which can infect both
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.