The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
ultrasound can't harm you right you don't have ionized you could alter send yourself all day every day for the rest of your life and you're not increasing your risk of cancer whereas if you did a CT scan of yourself every month you're gonna be in trouble after several months exactly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how does ultrasound work where does it fit into this and what are its limitations well the way ultrasound works is basically it's a high frequency so higher than what our ears can hear and effectively it's penetrating solid tissue so it's a high frequency sound wave versus an ionizing wave of energy exactly okay