The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in certain instances we're going to find you know targetable mutations and you know and by that I mean with you know of drugs or with immunotherapies where basically you know we'd say well look we can't we see it in the blood we actually with our best available scanning technology we can't actually see it in a way to direct a scalpel but we actually know what drug to give you to eradicate your trivial amount of cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.