The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So, what we tried to do is convince people who currently collect cord blood and store that, or other people to, "Yes, hey, don't only store cord blood. Store the whole placenta. Don't throw it out."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And that is if you get a company who says, "Well, we don't only wanna, you know, store cord blood or your dental stem cells. We also wanna store placentas because we've got enough people who are interested in doing that," whoop, it will take off, okay?
Because there are two options here, either you were born and you keep your placenta somehow for later use when you're 80 years old, you know, or whatever, or you have enough placenta stored in placenta banks that you just go there and find one that will fit you.
Will it be commercially available? Yes. When? I don't know. I hope next year. But it'll probably be made a couple of years from now.
And I think ultimately, it will come to the fact that at least part of, maybe all of the cord blood banks, as an example, will say, "Okay. We can store your cord blood. We can also store your placenta. Do you want that, yes or no?"