Peter Attia· MD
what that means it's a little more distant from the SARS coronavirus so there's lesson thinking that one could actually provide immune protection from the other though the fact there's some crust reactivity
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what that means it's a little more distant from the SARS coronavirus so there's lesson thinking that one could actually provide immune protection from the other though the fact there's some crust reactivity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.