Paul Saladino· MD
plastic lining of the cans will still contain BPE and BPS, bisphenols with potentially worse effects.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
plastic lining of the cans will still contain BPE and BPS, bisphenols with potentially worse effects.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but this has only led to manufacturers pacifying the consumer by replacing BPA with bps which is you know there's no reason to suspect that bps is any better for us or any less bad for us I should say than BPA
In fact BPS perhaps is even more of an endocrine disruptor for humans than BPA.
Even 'BPA-free' cans, including sodas, are lined with plastic that contains BPS, another endocrine disruptor that may not be any safer than BPA.