The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you are in an electric car there is a higher magnetic field so this is different than radio frequency but you can measure the magnetic field in a Tesla and it's significantly higher than what you will find in a gas burning automobile
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So at higher speeds in a Tesla, we're only going 43 mph. You are going to be exposed to more EMF than a gas powered car. 10, 15, significantly more. But it's ELF. It's magnetic field. It's not RF EMF like what you think about with your cell phone and that kind of stuff. So, yes, actually a Tesla does have more magnetic field than a gas powered car. Significantly more levels of magnetic fields as low as 3 millig in kids have been linked to certain cancers.