The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
then i think you might consider getting ultraviolet light from some source perhaps it's a tanning bed but you would also want to combine that with a red and near infrared device because you want to simulate that sunlight as best as possible and that might be one way to do it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then use something like a near-infrared device for the near-infrared wavelengths
if we want ultraviolet wavelengths which in some parts of the world are in short supply at certain latitudes during the winter I think we should use a tanning bed or it's one reasonable strategy