The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think it is it's difficult to know but I think we can I think we can probably put some put some brackets around it so first there's a you know just a huge amount of variability um that based on a lot of factors so where you live what type of food you eat and what your source of drinking water is would probably be the three biggest determinants of your exposure to mnps
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.