The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i thought for a long time that mitochondrial disease might be a good model for normal aging in some respects we know that i mean we talked about mitochondrial dysfunction as one of the hallmarks of aging so so severe mitochondrial dysfunction i would not argue as accelerated aging but i think interventions that are effective in a model of severe mitochondrial disease might also be effective in the context of normative aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.