The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I could completely understand how people would say, Well, I don't know, this is kind of new, let's see how this works. That's a perfectly rational response to have to see. Because obviously, there's a lot of things that we don't know about, and we're not going to know about it until we actually immunize and vaccinate a large population of people, but so far, it seems to be very safe, and it seems to be effective.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.