Peter Attia· MD
my sense is we're going to have 0% infections in TP trans paranal prostate biopsy but will we have done enough trans rectals to to really statistically show a difference
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my sense is we're going to have 0% infections in TP trans paranal prostate biopsy but will we have done enough trans rectals to to really statistically show a difference
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we think our approach to prevent infections tral is very good and we're probably more in the 1% range when we do a transpar Neal approach
I think that it will show that a um TP biopsies is 0% it will show that um they're slightly more uncomfortable um and that and then the cancer detection we have yet to fully analyze but excited to do that