The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the hot coronaviruses the cold ones cause the common cold and they're seasonal the ones that cause severe illness or the hot coronaviruses there's only been three in history and that's sars mers and covid19 now sars was studied 17 years out and the natural immunity was solid mers was studied three years out and the natural immunity was solid probably longer but that's just the time points at which they studied the viruses that no longer circulate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
sars was studied 17 years out and the natural immunity was solid mers was studied three years out and the natural immunity was solid probably longer but that's just the time points at which they studied the viruses that no longer circulate