Peter Attia· MD
it's a fascinating example of what happens if you do a selective protect vulnerable people strategy and then figure out a way to continue living life
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's a fascinating example of what happens if you do a selective protect vulnerable people strategy and then figure out a way to continue living life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we're talking about a radically different confirmed deaths per capita rate
the total population rate of the mortality per capita in sweden all in all cumulative this entire pandemic has been one in 663 now by comparison in the united states it's one in 387.