The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the number that has come out of the literature is that you need to treat 90 people to save one ACL so the number needed to treat but I think that also it probably speaks to how hard it is to treat yeah and right how hard it is to prevent also but it's potentially also decreasing risks of other injuries too yeah so it's not just ACLS
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.