We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
this is dangerous I mean we don't want someone listening to this who's suffered a TBI thinking I'm gonna go to some off-label clinic and just max you know repeatedly expose myself to hyperbarics I mean we the point here is this has to be studied it has to be studied rigorously it has to be said it empirically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.