Peter Attia· MD
the cancer stuff was still like it didn't matter so the cancer reduction didn't depend on Fox or 3 only the lifespan extension
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cancer stuff was still like it didn't matter so the cancer reduction didn't depend on Fox or 3 only the lifespan extension
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and actually if you look at the animal data from rodents where they're calorie restricted if you get rid of the Fox o3 the median lifespan extension is gone so the lifespan extension depends on Fox or 3d