The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and i think it kind of all goes back to the idea of what homeostasis is right so the idea that homeostasis is sort of trying to reach this new type of balance this new type of uh kind of it's a brain change that's responding to injury that's responding to a new demand on the brain right that it recognizes where it's beginning to need more fuel and better blood flow more support and that we can influence this to some degree based on what we do right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.