The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so one is the healthy individual can never contain the microorganism that is reported to be caught right right i think that another one is the corollary is that the uh anyone with the microorganism must have the disease and then i think any time you take a healthy person and insert the microorganism you must be able to cause the disease is that i think that's the third one what's the fourth it's been heat it's been eaten but that's the gist of the logic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.