Peter Attia· MD
but i think in order for them to be useful that's what you want right
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but i think in order for them to be useful that's what you want right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if the clocks are working you should absolutely be able to detect that signature well in advance of end of life right
But they are pretty powerful at predicting kind of remaining life expectancy or all-cause mortality. Of course, they can't predict who's going to get hit by a bus, or whatever, but in terms of kind of population averages, are you more or less likely than someone else with the same chronological age to have early mortality, they're actually pretty good at that.