The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was an effect of soluble uric acid so we started putting soluble uric acid on cells and so forth and we saw that it had all these biologic effects and we always had thought uric acid was kind of like a dead end product of something or even might be a good thing because some people said it was an antioxidant but it was causing pro-inflammatory effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we looked in the kitty there weren't any crystals there so then we realized it was an effect of soluble uric acid