Peter Attia· MD
but I sure as hell see with the existing technology a reason for people not to be dying of colorl cancer and men not to be dying of prostate cancer
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I sure as hell see with the existing technology a reason for people not to be dying of colorl cancer and men not to be dying of prostate cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but I sure as hell see with the existing technology a reason for people not to be dying of coloral cancer and men not to be dying of prostate cancer
But for prostate cancer, for colorectile cancer, we can absolutely say that screening will undoubtedly save lives if done correctly.