The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So one of them to go on hospicees, you no longer have access to or don't want curative intended care and things that go with it. And also someone somewhere has to certify that should nature run its course, you likely have six months or less to live. So those are the two forks in the road to qualify for hospice.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So one of them to go on to hospice is you no longer have access to or don't want curative intended care and things that go with it. And also someone somewhere has to certify that should nature run its course, you likely have six months or less to live. So those are the two forks in the road to qualify for hospice.