We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i experimented two years ago with a stronger prescription than normal right to get me to 2015 in my dominant eye for archery sure um goofed up your near though that's the problem i just abandoned it immediately after like six months of suffering because it made my presbyopia right worse yes it just isn't worth it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I experimented two years ago with a stronger prescription than normal right to get me to 2015 in my dominant eye for archery sure um goofed up your near though that's the problem I just abandon it immediately after like six months of suffering because it made my presbyopia worse yes go I like this just isn't worth it