The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's another big challenge here which is how do you identify which cells are the senescence cells in vivo when you don't have the luxury you've had in the animal lab which is you get to label those cells you get to put big targets on them what was the proof of concept that you could go into an organism and without the luxury of having the senescence cells raise their hand and here we are metaphorically actually send out snipers to get them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.