Peter Attia· MD
Uh abnormalities in on the female side have to do more with potential abnormalities have to do with like scarring in the tubes or if the tubes are blocked that and then it interferes with the egg like encountering the sperm.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh abnormalities in on the female side have to do more with potential abnormalities have to do with like scarring in the tubes or if the tubes are blocked that and then it interferes with the egg like encountering the sperm.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Uh the abnormalities in on the female side have to do more with potential abnormalities have to do with like scarring in the tubes or if the tubes are blocked that and then it interferes with the egg like encountering the sperm and what what leads to that a number of different things. Infection probably most commonly but also scarring from previous surgery potentially or a condition called endometriosis.