The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the scientific community respond in a very vigorous robust way publishing multiple papers large cohort studies showing that kids who were autistic and i got involved because i have a daughter with autism and you know kids who are autistic are no more likely to have gotten the mmr vaccine than kids who are not and similarly kids who get the mmr vaccines are more likely to become autistic than kids who don't and really sound epidemiologic studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.