Paul Saladino· MD
there's interesting ideas on both sides need to be sensible about this we need to not ignore the potential downsides to vaccines and we also need to really think about these in terms of the way they may have helped humans
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's interesting ideas on both sides need to be sensible about this we need to not ignore the potential downsides to vaccines and we also need to really think about these in terms of the way they may have helped humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.