The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You you want to know whether the woman's responding meaning that she's actually ovulating. There are other ways to assess that if she gets a period at the right time then she probably ovulated or if she gets pregnant of course um or you can check a progesterone level in the ludal phase the second half of the cycle and if it's elevated she probably ovulated. Yeah, we just happen to use ultrasounds just easier.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There are other ways to assess that. If she gets a period at the right time, then she probably ovulated or if she gets pregnant, of course. Um, or you can check a progesterone level in the ludal phase, the second half of the cycle, and if it's elevated, she probably ovulated. Yeah, we just happen to use ultrasounds just easier.