The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you look at the biceps you can pull the kind of the biceps into the joint and see a pretty good segment of it and see if it's inflamed torn something abnormal there and you can see the tendon of the bicep really well oh yes to see obviously is it frayed yes yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
uh you look at the biceps you can pull kind of the biceps into the joint and see a pretty good segment of it and see if it's inflamed torn U something abnormal there and and you can see the tendon of the bicep really well to see obviously is it frayed yes yeah