The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a principle we talk about it's called ALAR A L A R A which is as low as reasonably achievable and that's been the sort of the uh mantra for our radiation safety people the nuclear regulatory commission and whatnot that you want to keep things as low as as possible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there there's a principle we talk about it's called ARAR A L A R A which is as low as reasonably achievable and that's been the sort of the uh mantra for our radiation safety people
There's a principle we talk about it's called Aara A L A R A which is as low as reasonably achievable that you want to keep things as low as as possible