Peter Attia· MD
we test that that would hurt and you'd give way if you had and you but you'd say it doesn't hurt here it hurts here so it's tugging on that bicep
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we test that that would hurt and you'd give way if you had and you but you'd say it doesn't hurt here it hurts here so it's tugging on that bicep
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this is the speeds where you're turning your palm up go ahead superate see that really fires your biceps there good strong and I can I you're you're being kind I can I cannot break you and you can break me so we test that that would hurt and you'd give way if you had and you but you'd say it doesn't hurt here it hurts here so it's tugging on that bicep
this is the speeds where you're turning your palm up go ahead supinate you see that really fires your biceps there good strong and I can I you're you're being kind I can I cannot break you and you can break me so we test that that would hurt and you'd give way if you had and you but you'd say it doesn't hurt here it hurts here so it's tugging on that bicep