The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
classically just as you're saying you would pair uh something good like cocaine or sugar or food or a social interaction that mate something like that and you would see later that the mouse would choose to spend time in there revealing to us by its behavior that this thing was positive in value to it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the animal can report to us the the sign if you will the valence positive or negative of its experience by where it chooses to spend time