The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then there's a proof that even today you know with a much larger brain than the homo erectus double you know homo erectus started with 700 cc so today we have like 1400 and so he i think and he and he was a he was a hunter okay he was a carnivore so if he could manage we can manage as well and we if we can manage with 1400 cc he could manage 700 cc quite quite well on the on the prey of the brains and the other resources
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.