The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah absolutely so after about a year even after 6 months if people get up to that one to two peanuts a day or you know hazelnuts or or glasses of milk you can say all right you're done now and you can go home and do this at home
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah absolutely so after about a year even after 6 months if people get up to that one to two peanuts a day or you know hazelnuts or or glasses of milk you can say all right you're done now and you can go home and do this at home and then let me know how you're doing so yes after you've get to that threshold we definitely let you go home
make sure that by the end of the year if they didn't want to continue anymore we at least needed to get them up to an accidental ingestion of that food