The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
presumably The Sentinel node is doing its thing and it's still very feasible to do sentinel node mapping um after a an initial lumpectomy but you don't have a tumor to inject into well they know where the tumor bed was you don't have to inject the tumor itself um you're tracking the lymphatic channels of that portion of the breast so you can use area
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and if the whole breast is being removed for dcis then they will also do sentin a lymph node mapping of the lymph nodes in the armpit because once you remove the breast you can't go back post Hawk and do the Sentinal node mapping if there is an occult area of cancer found within that area of dcis