The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But but during your assessment, I assume what you're getting at is through some of those positional things such as laying the person on their front, manipulating the legs, getting the uh the herniation to retreat into the annulus. If so, you're saying if you can demonstrate resolution under a changing movement pattern, that gives you enough confidence that this is this doesn't need to be removed surgically.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.