The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I had a young woman a long time ago had never been reported who had traumatically very active athletic person had dramatically torn off that first dorsaloneurosseous muscle so she didn't have a nerve problem she tore the insertion right off of there which is what gives you that strength there and so she had just already atrophy this was at four weeks it was already atrophy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if I look at your hand there's three places that look for atrophy I look over here and I see that that's plump and not flattened out and what it'll do is it'll look like a gaunt um you know face and then over here I look here this also can develop a an atrophy there I had a young woman a long time ago had never been reported who had traumatically very active athletic person had dramatically torn off that first dorsal neurosius muscle so she didn't have a nerve problem she tore the insertion right off of there which is what gives you that strength there and so she had just already atrophy this was at four weeks it was already atrophy so I reattached it and it came back it's fine then