The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at 40 what's the answer it's it's pretty low the the you know we we stopped at four minutes so we didn't have anybody who couldn't do it but you are going to have some people who who do experience that as more discomforting than other people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
is it safe to say that the wider the cuff the lower um pressure you need to reach occlusion yes that's definitely true
when we say 40 of aop that doesn't necessarily mean a 40 reduction in blood flow either that's right so those are those are two separate things so somebody when we apply 40 of aop the reduction in blood flow might be different depending on how big the muscle is a variety of other things — and the discomfort associated with that will also vary depending on the person