Peter Attia· MD
I don't see anybody until they've read the book
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't see anybody until they've read the book
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well short of that I wrote back mechanic now it's not on the internet and the reason is they have to have some background understanding of how their back works and then go through a series of self tests that's what the book does the first thing is that just says draw a table what are activities that cause you pain what are activities that either take your pain away or are neutral write them all out now here is how you pattern recognize those all of those activities involve you bending backwards guess what change a light bulb overhead that triggers your pain we're starting to learn a little bit about what could the candidates be then we take them through some physical tests sit on a chair slouch extend drop one shoulder back hold five pounds out at front with arm straight so that's a compression test then we do a few self Shear tests then we do some nerve tensioning postures to start converging on subcategories of their pain