The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the blue curve on my chart here is planck's radiation curve so that's the prediction of how much earth would radiate to space if there were no greenhouse gases and uh the area under that curve as it's pointed out on the graph is 394 watts per square meter... instead what you see is the black jagged curve below with all sorts of wiggles in it and i'll call that the schwarzschild term after carl schwarzschild who was the first to show how to calculate that curve
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.