The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you have these nine-month-old cells, you know, they have been developed over the last nine months into the placenta and the baby. So, they are vigorously making anything that that fetus needed to become a baby, all right, or the placenta to grow itself.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Their mitochondria are healthy. So, not only can we replace the damaged cells, you know, damaged muscle, liver, possibly brain, but we could also potentially have different growth factors that these placental stem cells are secreting.
So, these are cells that are really programmed to make growth factors into anything they want at a high rate.