The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know it's linked this this running's linked to hunting and but then you carry and you're like oh they would have had to do this too like we also seem to be the only species that can really do this well and you know arguably we carried a lot more as early humans than we would have run because running is mostly reserved for hunts whereas you look at what is gathering so you go pick up some stuff and carry it around as you get more stuff and then you carry it back to camp
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at why the human body is built the way it is and what we're physically good at we're good at two things the first is running long distances in the heat so if you've read Born to Run or that was spawned from a 2004 paper in nature danber yep by Dan liberman and we have all these adaptations that make us good at running long distances slowly in the Heat and we would use that to hunt on hot days