The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well imagine if you could somehow create a little tunnel down to page 100 and snatch out pages 100 through 110 while keeping the incision really tiny and perform it through a very small keyhole procedure that procedure has gained some traction outside the u.s and in the u.s it seems to be an effective procedure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i would say the problem it was designed to solve was dry eye but i think the problem it really solved especially outside the united states was needing two lasers versus one